Debian Planet








Welcome to Debian Planet

Search

All your woody are (not quite, but very very very soon) belong to us.
Main Menu

  • Home

  • Topics

  • Web Links

  • Your Account

  • Submit News

  • Stats

  • Top 10

  • Debian

    These are important Debian sites one should not be without!

  • Official Debian site

  • Package search

  • Mailing list archives

  • Bug reports

  • Debian on CD

  • Unofficial woody CD ISOs

  • Unofficial APT sources

  • Developers’ Corner

    Other great Debian news sources:

  • Debian Weekly News

  • Kernel Cousin Debian

    (Debian mailing lists digested)
  • Community Groups

    Need help? You’re not alone on this planet.

  • debianHELP

    (User support site)

  • Debian International

  • DebianForum.de

    (Deutsch)

  • EsDebian

    (español)

  • DebianWorld

    (français)

  • MaximumDebian

    (Italiano)

  • DebianUsers

    (Korean)

  • Debian-BR

    (Português)

  • IRC

    The place to get help on a Debian problem (after reading docs) or to just chat and chill is #debian on irc.debian.org.

    Many of the Debian Planet staff live there so pop by and say hello.

    Wanna write?

    Got that latest or greatest scoop? Perhaps you have some important news for the Debian community? Submit a news item!

    Or perhaps you’ve written a rather ground breaking insight into some aspect of Debian and you feel compelled to share it with others? Knock up a longer editorial article and send it to the editors.

    Sponsorship

    DP is sponsored by Xinit Systems and kieser.net.

    Domains paid for and hosted by uklinux.net.

    Buy your Debian merchandise at DebianShop.com.

    Who’s Online

    There are currently, 72 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

    You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here.

      
    Threshold


    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren’t responsible for their content.

    Re: XFree86 4.2.0 (Score: 1, Insighful)
    by Anonymous on Thursday, January 24 @ 03:10:43 GMT

    Dude, only a small handful of Debian packagers (there are what, 800?) are jerks. Brandon appears to be a serious dick, but you have to hand it to him, on a technical level he knows his stuff.

    And I wouldn’t try to convince people that we must make Debian easy for newbies. Hell, I saw on a kernel project list one fellow who *wanted* Linux to be hard to use, “to keep the ****ing idiot count down,” and to keep the big corporations from tinkering with Linux (this list is/was hosted by Intel, for a kernel driver developed by Intel, of which this person was a big user of).

    Out of the ~6 billion people in this world, you just have to accept the fact that a good number of them are assholes.

    Sean 2. 😉

    [ Reply | Parent ]


    Re: XFree86 4.2.0 (Score: 4, Interesting)
    by DanielS on Thursday, January 24 @ 03:14:01 GMT
    (User Info) http://piro.kabuki.sfarc.net/daniel/

    > I’m beginning to find Debian packagers the most unfriendly and unhelpful people around.

    You may well find that; that’s your perogative.

    > I appreciate the work they do. I appreciate the FAQs they get asked every 5 seconds.

    > I don’t appreciate their smart arse comments and jibes at all.

    After enough FAQ’s, you’ll start being a “smartarse” too.

    > They have chosen to be package maintainers.

    No, no, I think you mean, “They have *VOLUNTEERED* to be package maintainers.” ( They can also choose not to respond to emails which they think are frivolous and answered in the FAQ/email archive.

    We can also choose to do so, since it concerns our package. If the users want to know, they can ask in -user.

    When your VCR breaks, do you:

    * Call the service number and wait for it to be escalated (and the answer to come down, proxied through the ranks)

    or

    * Call the lead tech at home and ask when he’ll fix it.

    Obviously the answer is a). Now let’s draw a parallel with Debian.

    When you are hoping for new and completely non-essential packages (hint: severity wishlist), do you:

    * Ask on -user and wait for a developer to tell you what they heard on -devel/IRC/from the maintainer, or

    * Email -devel/the lead tech and ask when they’re coming.

    Obviously, if you picked B in either question, you can expect “smartarse” responses. So why don’t you ask on -user, and just wait for someone to give you the answer?

    And here’s another point: a broken VCR would be severity “grave”. Hoping for new X packages would be severity “wishlist”.

    > IMHO, if they are sick of answering a question, then don’t reply. People will find out for themselves if no replies are forthcoming, or other people on the list will reply.

    Yeah, this is great until people start flaming you for not answering mail, or filing grave-severity bugs in error, which you then have to close/downgrade, and then they figure you must be alive, so you get more mail …

    > If maintainers do reply, it would be nice if they indicated where the ‘newbie’ could find further references to the subject, and not be an absolute bastard about the whole thing.

    Branden isn’t typical of most maintainers; I do know that he has had run-ins with Jack Horwarth before, and doesn’t like him, sooo …

    > Maintainers, if you feel like flaming, don’t reply. The clueless user will find a way to get the answer without your totally useless and aggravating reply. All you are doing by replying in the manner that I have witnessed so often recently is to piss off new users who may have actually started using debian, who now feel that the whole thing is way too ‘out of their league’ to be bothered with.

    New users belong on -user, not on -devel. -devel is for developers, who have already obtained the mandatory asbestos suit.

    > I believe the whole point of Debian is to make a usable system for non-technical people. Let’s either encourage newbies, direct them to the appropriate place, or refrain from flaming them. Surely, you package maintainers are so busy maintaining packages that you don’t have time to reply to emails with flames? Just let them go, they’ll be sorted out by other active participants on the list.

    Part of the job of maintaining a package is answering all the mail that’s related to it; else you’re not properly doing your job. This formed by far the biggest part of maintaining KDE. Why don’t you try it one day and see how you fare, eh? Only about 40% of the KDE-related mails I got came through the BTS or lists; most were sent personally to me. It’s impossible to keep up after a while, which is most of the reason why I gave up. Easier said than done, come down off your pedestal etc.

    -d, coming in to bat for the maintainers.

    [ Reply | Parent ]


    Re: XFree86 4.2.0 (Score: 0)
    by Anonymous on Thursday, January 24 @ 14:31:16 GMT

    They can also choose not to respond to emails which they think are frivolous and answered in the FAQ/email archive.

    And if they did that, someone, perhaps even you, would claim they’re unhelpful. It’s a no-win situtation.

    For the orignal questioner, the answer is thus:
    hold all the debian X-related packages, then download the 4.2 binary release. Make a copy of /usr/X11R6/ (just in case) and install 4.2 over it. When 4.2 comes into debian, then unhold those packages and upgrade. There are potential problems that may arise when you do the debian->XFree and XFree->debian switches, but that’s the price of living on the edge.

    [ Reply | Parent ]


    Re: XFree86 4.2.0 (Score: 1)
    by node on Friday, January 25 @ 05:44:42 GMT
    (User Info)

    > I believe the whole point of Debian is to make a

    > usable system for non-technical people.

    Where on earth did you get that idea?

    [ Reply | Parent ]


    Based on: PHP-Nuke

    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2000 by Debian Planet

    You can syndicate our news using the file backend.php.