Debian Planet

Welcome to Debian Planet


Apt-get into it.
Main Menu

  • Home

  • Topics

  • Web Links

  • Your Account

  • Submit News

  • Stats

  • Top 10

  • Debian

    These are important Debian sites one should not be without!

  • Official Debian site

  • Package search

  • Mailing list archives

  • Bug reports

  • Debian on CD

  • Unofficial woody CD ISOs

  • Unofficial APT sources

  • Developers’ Corner

    Other great Debian news sources:

  • Debian Weekly News

  • Kernel Cousin Debian

    (Debian mailing lists digested)
  • Community Groups

    Need help? You’re not alone on this planet.

  • debianHELP

    (User support site)

  • Debian International

  • DebianWorld




  • EsDebian


  • Debian-BR


  • DebianUsers


  • IRC

    The place to get help on a Debian problem (after reading docs) or to just chat and chill is #debian on

    Many of the Debian Planet staff live there so pop by and say hello.

    Wanna write?

    Got that latest or greatest scoop? Perhaps you have some important news for the Debian community? Submit a news item!

    Or perhaps you’ve written a rather ground breaking insight into some aspect of Debian and you feel compelled to share it with others? Knock up a longer editorial article and send it to the editors.


    DP is sponsored by and CheepLinux.

    Debian Planet runs on hardware donated by Xinit systems and is using‘s bandwidth.

    Who’s Online

    There are currently, 35 guest(s) and 1 member(s) that are online.

    You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here.


    What are the *real* .deb and .rpm differences
    by arcterex on Wednesday, June 13 @ 10:07:26 BST

    This has been thrown around by a few of the guys here for a while, but what are the *real* differences between debs and rpms? They both basically do the same thing, have pretty much the same options and switches, yet create a rift in the linux community between the debian based distros and the rpm based distros.
    Is the difference really that big, or is it mostly a religious preference? I know that on the backend they both work off a different database system, and the formats are different, but how hard would it be to make a redhat system work via dpkg/apt? Could it be done? On the flipside, could a debian system be made to work with rpms (I’m talking natively, not via alien).

    Something that seems would be advantagous of the linux community would be a common packaging format. .deb has some advantages, and .rpm has some. Both camps can put efforts into creating feature compatibility between the two (signed packages, encryption, etc etc), but that may be wasted effort when both camps could work towards making the distro work with ONE of the two formats.

    Your Name: Anonymous [ New User ]



    Allowed HTML:
    <p> <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <tt> <li> <ol> <ul>