Debian Planet

Welcome to Debian Planet


Apt-get into it.
Main Menu

  • Home

  • Topics

  • Web Links

  • Your Account

  • Submit News

  • Stats

  • Top 10

  • Debian

    These are important Debian sites one should not be without!

  • Official Debian site

  • Package search

  • Mailing list archives

  • Bug reports

  • Debian on CD

  • Unofficial woody CD ISOs

  • Unofficial APT sources

  • Developers’ Corner

    Other great Debian news sources:

  • Debian Weekly News

  • Kernel Cousin Debian

    (Debian mailing lists digested)
  • Community Groups

    Need help? You’re not alone on this planet.

  • debianHELP

    (User support site)

  • Debian International

  • DebianWorld




  • EsDebian


  • Debian-BR


  • DebianUsers


  • IRC

    The place to get help on a Debian problem (after reading docs) or to just chat and chill is #debian on

    Many of the Debian Planet staff live there so pop by and say hello.

    Wanna write?

    Got that latest or greatest scoop? Perhaps you have some important news for the Debian community? Submit a news item!

    Or perhaps you’ve written a rather ground breaking insight into some aspect of Debian and you feel compelled to share it with others? Knock up a longer editorial article and send it to our team.


    DP is sponsored by and CheepLinux.

    Debian Planet runs on hardware donated by Xinit systems and is using‘s bandwidth.

    Who’s Online

    There are currently, 33 guest(s) and 3 member(s) that are online.

    You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here.


    Re: Why must apt fall short of the mark? (Score: 1)
    by Robot101 (robot1<zero> on Saturday, June 09 @ 03:37:59 BST

    You’re missing the point. Apt doesn’t even offer the /possibility/ of the suggests/recommends. I don’t see their being added will make apt any more or less interactive than it already is. The default could be to prompt seperately for recommends and skip suggests, or even to ignore both and only consider them if you turn them on in the config/command line.

    Either way, it’d give apt the ability to fulfil all requirements without needing to launch dselecy, which currently it does not, and for no good reason.

    Personally, I and I’m sure many others find dselect to be un-navigable with this many packages in unstable, and no effective way to filter them besides the overstretched sections and priorities. I use apt-cache search|show and apt-get install because of this, but that doesn’t mean I don’t want to consider recommends or suggests.


    Your Name: Anonymous [ New User ]



    Allowed HTML:
    <p> <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <tt> <li> <ol> <ul>