Debian Planet

Welcome to Debian Planet


Apt-get into it.
Main Menu

  • Home

  • Topics

  • Web Links

  • Your Account

  • Submit News

  • Stats

  • Top 10

  • Debian

    These are important Debian sites one should not be without!

  • Official Debian site

  • Package search

  • Mailing list archives

  • Bug reports

  • Debian on CD

  • Unofficial woody CD ISOs

  • Unofficial APT sources

  • Developers’ Corner

    Other great Debian news sources:

  • Debian Weekly News

  • Kernel Cousin Debian

    (Debian mailing lists digested)
  • Community Groups

    Need help? You’re not alone on this planet.

  • debianHELP

    (User support site)

  • Debian International



  • EsDebian


  • DebianWorld


  • MaximumDebian


  • DebianUsers


  • Debian-BR


  • IRC

    The place to get help on a Debian problem (after reading docs) or to just chat and chill is #debian on

    Many of the Debian Planet staff live there so pop by and say hello.

    Wanna write?

    Got that latest or greatest scoop? Perhaps you have some important news for the Debian community? Submit a news item!

    Or perhaps you’ve written a rather ground breaking insight into some aspect of Debian and you feel compelled to share it with others? Knock up a longer editorial article and send it to the editors.


    DP is sponsored by Xinit Systems and

    Domains paid for and hosted by

    Buy your Debian merchandise at

    Who’s Online

    There are currently, 52 guest(s) and 6 member(s) that are online.

    You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here.


    Re: What are the *real* .deb and .rpm differences (Score: 0)
    by Anonymous on Friday, June 15 @ 19:15:05 BST

    the reason rpm is recommended is simple: everybody is using it. it has become the standard, no matter what LSB or other say.

    Well that’s a pretty dumb reason, IMHO. The problem with choosing .rpm over .deb, is that everything that .rpm can do, .deb can also do, but not vice versa. So if they choose .rpm, there will be features that are lost in Debian. Where as if they choose .deb, RedHat can still do everything that they currently do, and they don’ thave to create a nice consistant set of packages, but they can if they want to. RedHat would only lose time in having to convert everything from .rpm to .deb. Debian would lose functionality in having to convert everything from .deb to .rpm.

    Your Name: Anonymous [ New User ]



    Allowed HTML:
    <p> <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <tt> <li> <ol> <ul>