Debian Planet

Welcome to Debian Planet


Apt-get into it.
Main Menu

  • Home

  • Topics

  • Web Links

  • Your Account

  • Submit News

  • Stats

  • Top 10

  • Debian

    These are important Debian sites one should not be without!

  • Official Debian site

  • Package search

  • Mailing list archives

  • Bug reports

  • Debian on CD

  • Unofficial woody CD ISOs

  • Unofficial APT sources

  • Developers’ Corner

    Other great Debian news sources:

  • Debian Weekly News

  • Kernel Cousin Debian

    (Debian mailing lists digested)
  • Community Groups

    Need help? You’re not alone on this planet.

  • debianHELP

    (User support site)

  • Debian International

  • DebianWorld




  • EsDebian


  • Debian-BR


  • DebianUsers


  • IRC

    The place to get help on a Debian problem (after reading docs) or to just chat and chill is #debian on

    Many of the Debian Planet staff live there so pop by and say hello.

    Wanna write?

    Got that latest or greatest scoop? Perhaps you have some important news for the Debian community? Submit a news item!

    Or perhaps you’ve written a rather ground breaking insight into some aspect of Debian and you feel compelled to share it with others? Knock up a longer editorial article and send it to our team.


    DP is sponsored by and CheepLinux.

    Debian Planet runs on hardware donated by Xinit systems and is using‘s bandwidth.

    Who’s Online

    There are currently, 72 guest(s) and 3 member(s) that are online.

    You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here.


    Re: Xpdf and PDF copy-control (Score: 0)
    by Anonymous on Monday, March 12 @ 10:42:34 GMT

    By applying the patch, you refuse to honour the document authors licensing agreements. They write a document, and release it onto the net for you to read, but not to print and or copy, that’s the condition under which they release the document. If you wish to something else, you have to strike a deal with the author himself.

    If you think that their licensing sucks and because you don’t like it you can do as you wish to circumvent it, what say that anyone else should honour open source-licenses as GPL or BSD-license? Then you might as well let other people sell/expand GPLed software as they with disregarding of the GPL.

    Of course this is absurd. Just because a copy protection is weak (non-existent?) does not mean that you should break it. The PDF copy-control has a great function to fill, it prevents ordinary users from doing things with PDF-files that the author didn’t want them do do, just because they could do it! It prevents the temptation of the moment.

    If you are concerned with PDFs that have this type of copy-control enabled, please try to convince the authors to release them under “another license”, ie not using these features and create a publishing ethic where they are not used unless really necessary.

    IMHO, there are few documents out there that are “protected” that really shouldn’t be. “Breaking” the copy-control would just undermine the PDF (as someone pointed out earlier) and force authors to switch to other less portable formats. The big looser in such a case would surely be the people like me and you, using non-windows OSes.

    Your Name: Anonymous [ New User ]



    Allowed HTML:
    <p> <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <tt> <li> <ol> <ul>