<br /> Woody retrospective and Sarge introspective – Debian Planet

Welcome to Debian Planet

News for Debian. Stuff that *really* matters

Debian
These are important Debian sites one should not be without!

  • Official Debian site
  • Package search
  • Mailing list archives
  • Bug reports
  • Debian on CD
  • Debian Weekly News — excellent news source!
  • Unofficial APT sources
  • Developers’ Corner
  • Community
    Need help? You’re not alone on this planet.

  • debianHELP
    (User support site)

  • Debian International
  • DebianForum.de
    (Deutsch)

  • DebianForum.dk
    (Dansk)

  • EsDebian
    (Español)

  • DebianWorld
    (Français)

  • MaximumDebian
    (Italiano)

  • DebianUsers
    (Korean)

  • Debian-BR
    (Português)
  • Contribute
    Got that latest or greatest scoop? Perhaps you have some important news for the Debian community? Submit a news item!

    Or perhaps you’ve written a rather ground breaking insight into some aspect of Debian and you feel compelled to share it with others? Knock up a longer editorial article and send it to the editors.

    IRC
    The place to get help on a Debian problem (after reading docs) or to just chat and chill is #debian on irc.debian.org.

    Many of the Debian Planet staff live there so pop by and say hello.

    Debian Planet also has its own channel on the same network called #debianplanet.

    Sponsorship

    DP is sponsored by Xinit Systems.

    Domains paid for and hosted by uklinux.net.

    Buy your Debian merchandise at DebianShop.com.

    Woody retrospective and Sarge introspective
    Submitted by robster on Saturday, July 27, 2002 – 09:39
    Sarge“The battle’s done, and we kinda won,
    So we sound our victory cheer:
    Where do we go from here?”

    Anthony “aj” Towns has posted this message to the debian-project mailing list (non-technical discussions) about where we’ve been (Woody’s testing) and where we’re going (Sarge’s testing). The innards of the Woody release cycle are picked apart and scavenged from; the juicy succulent bits are kept, the gristle is left as a reminder. He further goes on to discuss what he would like to see from Sarge’s testing including regular CD builds using jigdo, debian-installer and fun with multiple architectures. Aj suggests that: The way I would like to see sarge run is basically to get it to “roughly” releasable status ASAP then keep it there.

    Category: News

    Control panel

    Comment viewing options:



    Select your prefered way to display the comments and click ‘Update settings’ to active your changes.

    Subject: A Silly Question
    Author: rustskull
    Date: Monday, 2002/08/12 – 19:30
    I am curious. With the way the debian organization has built and improved itself so far, it seems to me that it would at some point be able to develop some sort of quarterly/semi-annual release structure for the OS itself (ie; install debian once, update forever). I won’t elaborate any of my ideas, as people more intimate with the system would better know how to transition to and what structure would be most efficient…

    The point of my comment is that I hear many management structures and modifications to current systems being proposed or suggested, but this still puts anything releaseable in a fully tested form at least a year out, if not more.

    This seems like it would break the assaults on the pools that ensue every time a release is hinted at, with it only being worse the longer a “stable” distribution is taking to be released. It must have been *very* uncomfortable at times dealing with the last release… At least with a quartely (or semi-annual) update, people would know that the longest that a good package delivered just after the last release would have to wait to get into the next release would be 3-6 months, instead of a year or more.

    CMIIW, but the only things in the current release updates are bug fixes and patches, right? Everything else just sits in testing until the next release.

    I run potato (buring my woody disks today, don’t ask ;-), but I’ve heard people debate over just which is more stable, testing or sid…which brings up a set of interesting arguments, in and of itself.

    Anyhow, I’m sure that this has been suggested before, but I’m curious what the arguments would be as opposed to the current system. It sounds like this is a hot topic for discussion at times. I’ve already read the history of the pools…

    -rust

    [ return ]

    Search articles



    Category
    ·News (89)
    ·Features (1)
    ·Site News (5)
    ·HOWTOs (22)
    ·Tips
    ·Opinion (9)
    ·Q & A (13)

    Log in
    Username:

    Password:

    Remember me

    » Register
    » New password

    Debian Security Announcements
    DSA-179 gnome-gv
    DSA-178 heimdal
    DSA-177 pam
    DSA-176 gv
    DSA-175 syslog-ng
    DSA-174 heartbeat
    DSA-173 bugzilla
    DSA-172 tkmail
    DSA-171 fetchmail
    DSA-170 tomcat4

    Latest poll: Where did you start with Debian?
    Buzz
    Rex
    Bo
    Hamm
    Slink
    Potato
    Woody
    Sarge
    After Potato but before Woody

    home · archives · news feeds · about · polls · search · sections · user account

    Powered by the amazing Drupal